15 / 117
2014–20 · Indo–Nepal border · Human Protection

A Child Crosses the Border in an Afternoon. The Paperwork Never Follows

Children do not go missing in the gaps between villages. They go missing in the gaps between institutions.

A child does not stop at a jurisdiction. A case file does.
Indo–Nepal Child Protection Forum

Everyone along this border was doing their job. That was precisely the problem.

A child moving through the border districts passes through villages, markets, buses, trains, two police jurisdictions, two child-protection systems and an international line, sometimes within a single day. Every one of those has someone responsible for children in it.

None of them were connected. A concern raised in one place did not travel with the child to the next. The record stopped at the edge of somebody’s mandate, and the child kept going.

The Indo-Nepal Child Protection Forum was built to close that. Not as a programme with beneficiaries, but as a set of relationships - community networks, Indian and Nepali civil-society organisations, police, railway staff, labour and health departments, Child Welfare Committees, and the border forces - in one room, agreeing who calls whom.

Child-friendly booths went up at the border crossings themselves, run with the paramilitary forces stationed there. Regional protection meetings started happening. Rescue, restoration, repatriation and rehabilitation stopped being four separate improvisations by four different bodies.

The intervention here is coordination, which photographs badly and matters enormously. Nobody owns this pathway. A village raises an alert. A border post intercepts or refers. Police and child protection carry the formal weight. Organisations on either side of the line handle the restoration and what comes after it.

And what comes after it is the part the later work insists on. Getting a child out is not the end. A family assessment, a school re-enrolment, psychosocial support, the entitlements the household is owed, and somebody checking again in six months - that is what stops the same child moving through the same border again.

The forum did not make the border safe. It made the border legible: known contacts, agreed routes, professional relationships that hold when a case arrives at midnight. In a place where jurisdictions fragment, that is what stands between a child and disappearing between systems.

Children do not go missing in the gaps between villages. They go missing in the gaps between institutions.

SDG 16 · Peace, justice and strong institutions SDG 10 · Reduced inequalities Right to Protection Schedule VII (iii) · Gender equality

Coordination Is the Unglamorous Half

Convening two countries’ police, border forces and child-protection bodies costs travel, time and someone whose job it is to keep the relationships alive. No one funds it and everything depends on it.

Coordination Is the Unglamorous Half - Human Protection, 2014 Invest in This Work

Our Privacy Statement and Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to keep pages working, to understand which pages are read, and to improve what we publish. Some are essential. You can accept all, keep only the essential ones, or choose category by category, and change your mind at any time from Cookie Settings in the footer.

Policies and Safeguards