Prevention, protection, prosecution and partnership, held together so that a child is not lost between the village, the police station, the shelter and the court.
2
girls who made the call themselves
Forest-edge villages, Bahraich
They Had Learnt Two Things at the Meetings: That They Could Object, and Who to Call
In two different villages, two girls used the same piece of information at the moment their own marriage was arranged.
The first was fifteen. Her education had stopped after Class VIII and a marriage was planned for later that year. She called and said she wanted it postponed. Her parents, community members and the elected village leadership were brought into the discussion. The family agreed to wait until she reached adulthood.
The second was seventeen. She said she did not want the marriage that had been arranged for her. Family discussions did not stop the preparations. On the reported wedding date, public authorities intervened and the family gave an undertaking that the marriage would not go ahead before she turned eighteen.
Neither girl was rescued from the outside. Each one heard information at a meeting, measured it against her own life, and made contact under pressure from the people she lives with. The reporting route mattered because it connected a decision she had already made to adults who were obliged to act on it.
Postponement is not the end of it. A girl in this position can face renewed pressure, an interrupted education, or retaliation inside her own household.
The question that follow-up has to keep asking is not whether the wedding happened. It is whether the life she wanted to continue - school, work, her own timing - actually became more possible.
She heard the information at a meeting, measured it against her own life, and made the call.
Information, and Someone Who Answers
The whole mechanism is a series of village meetings and a phone number attached to a person a girl already trusts. It costs almost nothing to run and nothing at all to remember.
Two girls remembering one phone number is not luck. It is a structure built into the meetings this programme runs - the shape of that structure is what follows.
The programme addresses trafficking, child marriage, child labour, abuse, unsafe migration and sexual and reproductive health risks as connected protection concerns rather than isolated incidents. Protection means rescue, and then repatriation or reintegration, and then the social, psychological and economic rehabilitation that decides whether a child is genuinely safe a year later.
Why This Work Matters
Vulnerability accumulates. School exclusion, economic distress, unsafe migration, discrimination and weak support networks become pathways to exploitation. The Indo-Nepal border adds mobility and jurisdictional complexity, while many risks remain hidden inside households and informal labour arrangements.
Human Trafficking across an open border
Child Marriage
Child and Adolescent Labour and Unsafe Work
Domestic Violence and Sexual Abuse
The Four Ps in Practice
Community structures notice early; statutory bodies act together. DEHAT works as a partner to the administration, not as a substitute for it.
Prevention
Child Parliaments, Village Level Child Protection and Welfare Committees, Block Level Child Protection and Welfare Committees, youth groups, parents, community volunteers and migration tracking.
Protection
Rescue, repatriation or reintegration, and social, psychological and economic rehabilitation with continued follow-up.
Prosecution
Case accompaniment, legal aid, compensation claims and follow-through on prosecution where the law requires it.
Partnership
Child Welfare Committees, District Child Protection Units, District Child Protection Committees, the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit, Special Juvenile Police Units, Child Welfare Police Officers, Child Marriage Prohibition Officers, the Labour Department, Sashastra Seema Bal, Panchayats, Schools and Service Providers.
“Children and the adults around them are safer because communities notice early and systems act together.”
Goals This Programme Reports Against
Sustainable Development Goal16
Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Case accompaniment, legal aid and follow-through with Child Welfare Committees, Juvenile Justice Boards, Anti-Human Trafficking Units, police, the courts, Legal Services Authorities (DLSA, SLSA, NALSA) and the child rights commissions (SCPCR, NCPCR).
Sustainable Development Goal5
Gender Equality
Prevention of child marriage, response to violence and abuse, and support for girls after rescue.
Sustainable Development Goal8
Decent Work and Economic Growth
Target 8.7 in practice: child labour, bonded labour and trafficking for work.
Sustainable Development Goal10
Reduced Inequalities
Rehabilitation that continues after the case closes, so a rescued child is still safe a year later.
Where this programme meets the cycle
The Structural Vulnerability Cycle, Read From This Programme.
Human Protection works where accumulated vulnerability turns into exploitation, and on the systems that should have noticed earlier.
Addressed directlyAffected indirectly5 of 16 stages addressed directly
Underage Mother
Menstrual Dignity
School Dropout
Child & Bonded Labour
Child Marriage
Human Trafficking
Boys as Bread-Earners
Discrimination and Violence
The Next Mother
Exploitation & rights
1 in 9
A Childhood Traded for Wages
This child works instead of learning. In Shravasti, around 1 in 9 children labours in fields, kilns, hotels and homes - once out of school, a child the market can put a price on.
Addressed directly
Identification, withdrawal, labour-department action and school re-enrolment. Withdrawals from brick kilns, dhabas, workshops and domestic labour are cross-checked against the trafficking register, since many working children were moved into that labour by a trafficker in the first place.
Census / administrative records · Shravasti (11.2%)
Programme journey
Protection Begins Long Before a Crisis.
Children rarely enter crisis suddenly. In border regions under strain, risk accumulates gradually across fragmented systems of education, migration, labour, health, protection and justice long before formal intervention occurs. The challenge is not only the absence of protection systems. The deeper challenge is the absence of continuity between them.
Vulnerability is rarely a single event. It accumulates across disconnected systems where children fall through invisible gaps long before formal protection mechanisms intervene.
What the Ecosystem Is Built to Do
Identify vulnerability earlierSustain continuity longerReduce repeated vulnerabilityStrengthen community ownershipPreserve continuity across fragmented systemsSustain protection beyond moments of crisis
01
How a Child Falls Through
Across high-risk border ecosystems, vulnerability progresses through recognisable stages. System response is often mismatched to that progression. Select a stage to see the mismatch, and what DEHAT does at that point.
School Discontinuation Begins
Absenteeism, withdrawal from education, or quiet exit from school.
Typical system response
Often treated as temporary dropout with limited follow-up.
Where DEHAT works
Child Parliaments, Village Level Child Protection and Welfare Committees, adolescent platforms and parent networks flag absence early and re-engage the household.
02
Community-Led Protection Infrastructure
Communities are often the first to recognise vulnerability. DEHAT works to turn local systems into active protection infrastructure connected to institutional response, across four interconnected layers.
Communities are not positioned as passive beneficiaries. They function as active protection actors connected to broader institutional and cross-border protection systems.
03
Theory of Change
Children and adolescents are protected from harm, with stronger continuity, community ownership and sustained support systems across border ecosystems under strain. Five pathways carry that goal.
Early Identification
Child Parliaments, Village Level Child Protection and Welfare Committees, youth groups, migration tracking and community vigilance systems.
Human and family outcome
Sustained safety, education continuity and protective support within families and communities
Ecosystem outcome
More coordinated, visible and continuity-centered protection ecosystems
Critical enabler
Standardised onboarding, refresher training, role clarity and scenario-based learning systems
Illustrative indicator
% of adolescents continuing education after intervention or support
04
From Relationship-Held Continuity to System-Held Continuity
The model was refined through operational reflection on where continuity weakens in real-world protection ecosystems. Rather than treating these as isolated implementation challenges, they are built into system design.
Where the ecosystem strainsHow continuity is reinforced
05
A Phased Investment Roadmap
The next phase is not about proving that the ecosystem works. It is about ensuring the operational maturity already built can translate into continuity infrastructure and long-horizon partnerships. Not every investment serves the same purpose. Mapped in direct consultation with the communities we work with, over a planning process that ran from 2021 to 2026.
Rescue is the visible moment; restoration is where protection is won or lost. This work keeps a case open long after the headline, through reintegration, schooling and compensation.
Priority Investments
Reintegration tracking and long-term follow-up
Psychosocial accompaniment
School re-enrolment after rescue
Compensation and entitlement linkage
Family and community restoration
Ask for the Full Funding Plan →Each phase’s full funding plan - budget, results framework and implementation timeline - is ready on request, for this phase alone or as a multi-year commitment across all five.
06
What Makes the Approach Different
Protection failures rarely emerge from the absence of intervention alone. They emerge when continuity weakens across families, migration journeys, institutions, restoration pathways and long-term follow-up systems. Most protection work is measured at the moment of rescue. DEHAT measures it two years later.
Where Most Protection Work Stops
01Interception→A child removed from immediate harm
02Rescue→A case registered and a system activated
- most programmes stop here. DEHAT keeps going.
03Restoration→Schooling, entitlements and family reintegration
04Continuity→Follow-up that outlasts the team member who opened the file
05Prevention→A village that notices the next risk before it becomes a case
Every Project, in Chronological Order
14 / 14 · 2011 – 2023
2011 – August 2023
2011–12 to 2013–14
2013–2016
2013
2014–2015
2016–2018
From 2016
2017–present, continuous
2020–2022
2021–2024
2022–2027
2023–2025
2023–2027
2023–2025
What This Programme Has Done
3,271Children’s Cases Logged and Carried through the Emergency Helpline Register
1,831Child Marriages Stopped before the Wedding Date
1,038Lost, Abandoned and Runaway Children Restored to Their Families
642Child-Labour Cases Resolved, Cross-Checked Against the Trafficking Register
382Children Intercepted from Cross-Border Trafficking Risk, 72 of Them Carried to a Registered FIR
Cumulative across every case this programme has responded to. One child may appear in more than one figure, so these are not added together. Trafficking and child labour are treated as one intersecting caseload, since children are often moved into labour by the same trafficker.
Where you come in
Everything Above Is on the Record. Choose How You Want to Be Part of What Comes Next.
The register above lists 14 projects in this programme, each with the partner who funded it and what it did. Support of any kind is welcome on the same terms.
Our Privacy Statement and Cookie Policy
This site uses cookies and similar technologies to keep pages working, to understand which pages are read, and to improve what we publish. Some are essential. You can accept all, keep only the essential ones, or choose category by category, and change your mind at any time from Cookie Settings in the footer.