16 / 117
2008–09 · Bahraich · Rights & Entitlements

Seventy-Two Women Signed One Letter, and the Ration Shop Opened on Time

They had come together to save money. They stayed together to make a public service answerable.

72
signatures on one letter to the District Magistrate

A woman turned away at a ration shop has a complaint. Seventy-two women with the same complaint have a case.

The group did not form around food. It formed around savings and credit. Members borrowed for cultivation, for a buffalo, for farm equipment, for the shortfalls that come between harvests. Several joined literacy learning at the same time and, for the first time, could sign their own names.

What the meetings also produced was less countable. Sitting in the same room every month, women found that the difficulty each had assumed was hers alone was in fact everybody’s. The ration shop came up again and again. Supplies the families were entitled to were not consistently there, and questions at the counter were brushed aside.

They decided that foodgrain under the public distribution system was not a favour to be asked for politely and dropped when refused. It was attached to a public programme, and it was theirs.

They went to the shopkeeper first. When that changed nothing, they drafted a representation to the District Magistrate. More than seventy-two women signed it. That number is the whole method: one signature is a customer with a grievance, seventy-two is a constituency, and an administration answers the second differently from the first.

An official enquiry followed. So did pressure to settle for something less, and the women were approached more than once with a compromise. They kept meeting. They held the same position in public that they had agreed in private, which is harder than it sounds and is the reason the claim survived.

The distribution became regular afterwards, and the tone at the counter changed too.

DEHAT’s part in this sat before the letter and around it - helping the group form, running the literacy classes, opening the discussion about what a right is and where it can be claimed. The women identified the problem, decided what an acceptable answer looked like, gathered the signatures and held the line.

The literacy matters more than it first appears. Learning to sign your name is usually filed under personal achievement. Here it was the thing that let seventy-two people put their names to a shared demand.

One signature is a customer with a grievance. Seventy-two is a constituency.

SDG 1 · No poverty SDG 2 · Zero hunger SDG 5 · Gender equality Right to Survival Schedule VII (i) · Hunger and poverty Schedule VII (iii) · Gender equality

A Savings Group Is Civic Infrastructure

A women’s collective costs a facilitator, a meeting place and the patience to keep it going for years. What it becomes is a standing route for making public services answerable.

A Savings Group Is Civic Infrastructure - Rights & Entitlements, 2008 Invest in This Work

Our Privacy Statement and Cookie Policy

This site uses cookies and similar technologies to keep pages working, to understand which pages are read, and to improve what we publish. Some are essential. You can accept all, keep only the essential ones, or choose category by category, and change your mind at any time from Cookie Settings in the footer.

Policies and Safeguards